In today’s article I read about some more things that the government has been doing in their war against terrorism. The trouble is that these actions seem to indicate that the government’s definition of “terrorist” is expanding to “anyone who does things the government doesn’t like”. Let’s take a look at what’s been happening, and what it reveals about the governments priorities.
Today’s article focuses on an event in the aftermath of the Snowden leaks which speaks volumes about the government’s attempt to maintain its secrecy. The event is that a Brazilian citizen was detained in Heathrow Airport for 9 hours before being released without charge. This journalist, David Miranda, was detained and questioned legally by U.K. law, but the only reason for the detention appears to be that Miranda is affiliated with Glenn Greenwald, who is in turn connected to Edward Snowden. Miranda has been acting for some time acting as a messenger between Greenwald and his other contacts, and when he was detained he also had all of his electronics confiscated, which would have contained the information he was carrying.
As I read through the article I couldn’t help but think about the inherent friction which by necessity exists between the government and the news. On the one hand freedom of the press is a thing. The government should not be allowed to interfere with the reporting of news, seeing as how it is the only way the public can often get information. On the other hand, not all information should be reported, as some intel could severely compromise military endeavors, leading to needless deaths on the battlefield. This very fact was what led to the creation of the the phrase “loose lips sink ships” in the US. Reporting too much can be damaging. So, up until this point, there has been a semi-unspoken agreement between the press and the government to avoid reporting on things that could potentially get people killed, which is a very sensible agreement to have. The trouble is that the government has grown used to, and even expectant of, its secrecy, and looks to be ready to fight to keep it.
We appear to be entering a new era of reporting, where reporters are finding it to be necessary in the pursuit of professional integrity to report on the government itself, which obviously the government does not appreciate too much. The reasons for the government’s dislike for the reporting is two-fold. There is first of all the reporting of information which is harmful to the government’s personnel’s safety, such as military recruits and such. This falls under the whole “loose lips” category, and it is understandable if the government wishes to continue to keep this information under wraps. The other side of the coin is when the information reported is harmful to the government itself, as in it affects the public’s opinion of the government’s activities. The situation with David Miranda falls under this second category. The leaked Snowden files have more to do with how the government has been getting info than with what that information itself is. Therefore, the government backlash has not been in pursuit of the safety of its people, but rather the safety of its operations. The detainment of David Miranda speak out that the government is willing to use its powers not just to protect people form harm, but itself from criticism.
I do, to an extent, understand and uphold the government’s hold on secrecy. They do need it to do their work, work which does do much to protect people. But Snowden did what he did because he saw the government purposefully going around the sanctions placed on them. When this happens then the government suddenly has no way of being restrained, and this makes it all the more important to restrain it. Therefore in this situation I have to say that I support the actions of the reporters. They are trying to show that the government is getting too big and independent, while the government is trying desperately to hold on to its power. The fact that it has reacted so strongly to hide what they’re doing is evidence that they know what they are doing is morally sketchy at best, and that the general populace would not be pleased with what is happening. Romans 13:1 says “Let every person be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those that exist have been instituted by God.” we should obey the government. But our governing officials are subject to laws themselves, and if they are breaking those laws then they need to be brought up short just like anyone else. Even Paul brought up his Roman citizenship when his accusers were doing things which they ought not. Part of being a good citizen is standing up to a corrupt government, by legal means, and that is what these reporters are doing.
The government is getting a little too aggressive in protecting its secrecy. Yes, secrecy is important is you want to keep sensitive information protected. But if you’re detaining people in airports just because they’re affiliated with people who are reporting on you, that borders on totalitarianism, and needs to to be curtailed rapidly. Hopefully, we’ll be able to get the government in check before it gets to big to stop. Hopefully it’s not there already.